Internet Engineering Task Force Q. Fu, Ed. Internet-Draft Z. Cao Intended status: Informational China Mobile Expires: August 17, 2014 H. Song Huawei Febrary 2014 What's the Impact of Virtualization to ALTO? draft-fu-alto-nfv-usecase-01 Abstract This draft presents a use case of Application Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO) with the emergence of Network Function Virtualization (NFV). The Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO) Service provides network information (e.g., basic network location structure and preferences of network paths) with the goal of modifying network resource consumption patterns while maintaining or improving application performance. The emerging Network Functions Virtualisation (NFV), as currently being in progress in ETSI NFV, leverages standard IT virtualisation technology to consolidate many network equipment types onto industry standard high volume servers, switches and storage. The usecase presented in this draft discusses the impact of virtualization on the ALTO protocol. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on August 17, 2014. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. Fu, et al. Expires August 17, 2014 [Page 1] Internet-Draft VNF-ALTO Febrary 2014 This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3. Impact of Virtualized Endpoints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 4. ALTO usecase with NFV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 5. Interaction Architecture of ALTO and NFV . . . . . . . . . . 6 6. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 1. Introduction This draft present a use case of Application Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO) with the emergence of Network Function Virtualization (NFV). The Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO) Service provides network information (e.g., basic network location structure and preferences of network paths) with the goal of modifying network resource consumption patterns while maintaining or improving application performance. Typical deployment scenarios of ALTO include P2P and CDN, in which P2P tracker or CDN request router queries ALTO server for network map and cost map, in order to make decisions on which peer to select for content sharing. The emerging Network Functions Virtualisation (NFV), as currently being in progress in ETSI NFV, leverages standard IT virtualisation technology to consolidate many network equipment types onto industry standard high volume servers, switches and storage. The NFV architecture in ETSI ongoing work includes the NFV MANO(Management and Orchestration), the OSS/BSS, the E/NMS (Element/Network Management System), the VNF (Virtualized Network Function) and the NFVI(Network Function Virtualization Infrastructure), as is shown in Figure 1. The NFV MANO is composed of the VIM (Virtualized Infrastructure Manager), the NFV Orchestrator, and the VNF Manager. The VIM is responsible for controlling and managing the NFVI compute, storage and network resources, usually within one Operator's infrastructure sub-domain. The NFV orchestrator is responsible for the lifecycle management of Network Services across the entire Operator's domain. The VNF manager is responsible for the lifecycle Fu, et al. Expires August 17, 2014 [Page 2] Internet-Draft VNF-ALTO Febrary 2014 management of VNF instances.Interactions between NFV MANO, E/NMS, VNF and VNFI are beyond scope of this draft. With the trend of various network functions being virtualized, there will be impacts on cost and network characteristics of the service endpoints. Under the ALTO architecture, we analyze the problems and the necessity of extending the ALTO protocols to faithfully reveal the network to the clients. The central problem this draft would like to investigate is: what's the impact of virtualization to ALTO. +---------------------+ | NFV-MANO | +-----------+ | +------------+ | | OSS/BSS +-----------+----|Orchestrator| | +-----+-----+ | +------+-----+ | | | | | | | +------+-----+ | +-----------+ | | | | | E/NMS |-----------+----+ | | +-----------+ | | | | | | | VNFM | | | | | | | +-----+-----+ | | | | | VNF |-----------+----+ | | +-----------+ | | | | | | +------+-----+ | | | | | +-----+-----+ | +------+-----+ | | NFVI |-----------+----| VIM | | +-----------+ | +------------+ | +---------------------+ Figure 1: NFV Architecture in Brief This draft analyzes the impacts of virtualized endpoints to application layer traffic optimization and presents a usecase of ALTO in CDN and P2P network with the peers as a VNF(Virtualized Network Function). . 2. Terminology The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]. We use the following terms defined in [RFC5693]. Application, Peer, ALTO service, ALTO server, ALTO client, ALTO query, ALTO Reply. Fu, et al. Expires August 17, 2014 [Page 3] Internet-Draft VNF-ALTO Febrary 2014 And the following terms used in this document have their definitions from the NFV end to end architecture [NFVE2E]. NFV: network function virtualization. NFV technology uses the commodity servers to replace the dedicated hardware boxes for the network functions, for example, home gateway, enterprise access router, carrier grade NAT and etc. So as to improve the re- usability, allow more vendors into the market, and reduce time to market. NFV architecture includes a NFV controller (orchestrator) to manage the virtual network functions and the infrastructure resources. NF: A functional building block within an operator's network infrastructure, which has well-defined external interfaces and a well-defined functional behavior. Note that the totality of all network functions constitutes the entire network and services infrastructure of an operator/service provider. In practical terms, a Network Function nowadays is often a network node or physical appliance. VNF: virtual network function, an implementation of an executable software program that constitutes the whole or a part of an NF that can be deployed on a virtualization infrastructure. VM: virtual machines, a program and configuration of part of a host computer server. Note that the Virtual Machine inherits the properties of its host computer server e.g. location, network interfaces. SLA: Service Layer Agreement. 3. Impact of Virtualized Endpoints This section analyzes the impact of virtualization when application or service endpoints are deployed on virtualized infrastructure. It is generally believed that generic computing equipment is difficult to accomplish the same capability of specilized and dedicated equipment. Operator network normally consists of many dedicated equipment, and the services running on them are not vitualized. NFV initiatives investigate the use cases, architecture and requirements of moving network functions to the virtualized infrastructure. We analyze the impacts of virtualized endpoints to application layer traffic optimization for the following aspects. Fu, et al. Expires August 17, 2014 [Page 4] Internet-Draft VNF-ALTO Febrary 2014 1. Performance. The NFV framework is claimed to be able to instantiate and configure any given VNF over the underlying infrastructure so that the resulting VNF instance performance is conforming to the expressed requirement. Using appropriate VNF configuration schemes [I-D.song-opsawg-virtual-network-function-config], the operator or service provider can express their performance requirement. From this point, it is the same as physical and non-virtualized service endpoints. The difference is that the service assurance of virtualized endpoints is more difficult to ensure. 2. Portability. Different from physical equipment, NFV framework is able to provide the capability to load, execute and move VNFs across different but standard mutlivendor environments, and have to support an interface to decouple VNF associated software instances from the underlying infrastructure. Portability has impacts on the mobility and network location of the service points, which in return will impact the service point selection process and service continuity. 3. Elasticity. The NFV framework is able to allow VNFs to be scaled with SLA requirements, on-demand scaling or automatically scaling. With the elasticity capability, VNF endpoints capability with respect to computing and networking are dynamic. The ALTO discovery and selection process will be impact to reflect such dynamic information. 4. Resilience. NFV framework provides the necessary mechanisms to allow VNF to be recreated after a failure. In addition to OAM in traditional non-virtualized environment, the NFV MANO will manage the metrics such as packet loss rate, latency, delay variation of flows, maximum time to detect and recover from faults. All of these information will be valuable to ALTO client. 5. Energy efficient. Studies have indicated that NFV could potentially deliver up to 50% energy saving compared with traditional appliance based network infrastructure. In service point selection, this could be a criteria when the service provider is interested in saving power. 6. Service assurance. Dedicated carrier-grade devices normally have requirements like 99.999%, but the such high availability is still challenging for VNFs. The ALTO server should be aware of the assurance level of these virtualized endpoints. 7. Network infrastructure maintenance. The VNFs may be bridged and linked using the virtualized switches on the computing node. The network layer performance and availability metrics are only Fu, et al. Expires August 17, 2014 [Page 5] Internet-Draft VNF-ALTO Febrary 2014 possible to collect when the OAM have established the tunnels to these virtual network infrastructure. For example, normal PING can only reflect the physical computing node availability, but cannot reflect the VMs bridged using virual switchs and hidden with tunnel encapsulations. 4. ALTO usecase with NFV The emergance of NFV means that some legacy devices which used to work on a physical server, now can be moved to a VM and work as a VNF. Under such circumstance, the NFV MANO can act as a Dynamic Network Info provider for ALTO. The following paragraph will present a usecase of ALTO in CDN with NFV. In the CDN network, the user agent first makes initial request to the Request Router. The Request Router will first query the ALTO server for network and cost map to select an appropriate surrogate. The Request Router then responds to the UA with a redirection to the selected surrogate. The UA then connects directly to the suggested surrogate to obtain the content. When a certain surrogate changes to a VNF and is managed by a NFV MANO, The NFV MANO can dynamically update the network and cost info of the surrogate to the ALTO server. In the meantime, the NFV MANO should also keep ALTO server informed about the virtualized nature of the VNF surrogate, since its performance might be lower than physical devices. In the migration stage of NFV, in which VNF and physical devices coexist in the network, ALTO server may consider the virtualized nature of VNF as a rating criteria that should inform the clients. Clients may choose physical devices instead of VNF surrogates due to consideration of performance. In the P2P scenario, similar situations can also happen when peers become VNFs. In this case, NFV MANO should also inform ALTO server about the virtualize nature of the VNF peers. And P2P trackers can take such nature into consideration when selecting peers to obtain content. 5. Interaction Architecture of ALTO and NFV A vertical architecture is proposed in this draft for ALTO and NFV interaction, in which NFV MANO is in responsible of info update to the ALTO server, as is shown in Figure 2. Fu, et al. Expires August 17, 2014 [Page 6] Internet-Draft VNF-ALTO Febrary 2014 +---------------------+ | NFV-MANO | +-----------+ | +------------+ | +-------------+ | OSS/BSS +------+----|Orchestrator|---+-------+ ALTO server | +-----+-----+ | +------+-----+ | +-------------+ | | | | | | +------+-----+ | +-----------+ | | | | | E/NMS |------+----+ | | +-----------+ | | | | | | | VNFM | | | | | | | +-----+-----+ | | | | | VNF |------+----+ | | +-----------+ | | | | | | +------+-----+ | | | | | +-----+-----+ | +------+-----+ | | NFVI |------+----| VIM | | +-----------+ | +------------+ | +---------------------+ Figure 2 ALTO and NFV interaction architecture In this architecture, NFV MANO can automatically update fine or coarse grained VNF info to the ALTO server timely. The virtualized nature of the VNFs should be informed to the ALTO server by NFV MANO as a rating criteria. In the meantime, details of VNF can be updated to the ALTO server by NFV MANO according to privacy privilege configured by the user. The information NFVO updates to the ALTO server for alto service discovery includes, but not limited to, the topology of the VNFs, the detail info of the network resource allocated to the VNF instances(such as the capacity, the available memory, the available CPU, and etc.), the lifecycle management info of VNFs, and etc.. There is another draft talking about details of the these properties [I-D.wu-alto-endpoint-pid-properties]. 6. Informative References [I-D.song-opsawg-virtual-network-function-config] Song, H. and Z. Cao, "The Problems of Virtual Network Function Configuration", draft-song-opsawg-virtual- network-function-config-01 (work in progress), October 2013. Fu, et al. Expires August 17, 2014 [Page 7] Internet-Draft VNF-ALTO Febrary 2014 [I-D.wu-alto-endpoint-pid-properties] Wu, Q. and Z. Cao, "Endpoint and PID Property Extension for virtualized endpoint and infrastructure", draft-wu- alto-endpoint-pid-properties-00 (work in progress), January 2014. [NFVE2E] "Network Functions Virtualisation: End to End Architecture, http://docbox.etsi.org/ISG/NFV/70-DRAFT/0010 /NFV-0010v016.zip", . [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [RFC5693] Seedorf, J. and E. Burger, "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO) Problem Statement", RFC 5693, October 2009. Authors' Addresses Qiao Fu (editor) China Mobile China China Email: fuqiao1@outlook.com Zhen Cao China Mobile Xuanwumenxi Ave. No.32 Beijing 100053 China Email: zehn.cao@gmail.com, caozhen@chinamobile.com Haibin Song Huawei Email: haibin.song@huawei.com Fu, et al. Expires August 17, 2014 [Page 8]