]> USC/ISI

ietf@hardakers.net

Google

warren@kumari.net

This document deprecates the use of the RSASHA1 and RSASHA1-NSEC3-SHA1 algorithms for the creation of DNS Public Key (DNSKEY) and Resource Record Signature (RRSIG) records. It updates RFC4034 and RFC5155 as it deprecates the use of these algorithms.

Introduction The security of the protection provided by the SHA-1 algorithm has been slowly diminishing over time as various forms of attacks have weakened its cryptographic underpinning. DNSSEC originally made extensive use of SHA-1, for example as a cryptographic hash algorithm in RRSIG and Delegation Signer (DS) records. Since then, multiple other algorithms with stronger cryptographic strength have become widely available for DS records and for Resource Record Signature (DNSKEY) and DNS Public Key (RRSIG) records . Operators are encouraged to consider switching to one of the recommended algorithms listed in the and tables, respectively. Further, support for validating SHA-1 based signatures has been removed from some systems. As a result, SHA-1 as part of a signature algorithm is no longer fully interoperable in the context of DNSSEC. As adequate alternatives exist, the use of SHA-1 is no longer advisable. This document thus further deprecates the use of RSASHA1 and RSASHA1-NSEC3-SHA1 for DNS Security Algorithms.

Requirements notation The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

Deprecating SHA-1 from DNSSEC Signatures and Delegation RRs The RSASHA1 and RSASHA1-NSEC3-SHA1 algorithms MUST NOT be used when creating DS records. Operators of validating resolvers MUST treat RSASHA1 and RSASHA1-NSEC3-SHA1 DS records as insecure. If no other DS records of accepted cryptographic algorithms are available, the DNS records below the delegation point MUST be treated as insecure. The RSASHA1 and RSASHA1-NSEC3-SHA1 algorithms MUST NOT be used when creating DNSKEY and RRSIG records. Validating resolver implementations ( section 10) MUST continue to support validation using these algorithms as they are diminishing in use but still actively in use for some domains as of this publication. Operators of validating resolvers MUST treat DNSSEC signing algorithms RSASHA1 and RSASHA1-NSEC3-SHA1 as unsupported, rendering responses insecure if they cannot be validated by other supported signing algorithms.

Security Considerations This document deprecates the use of RSASHA1 and RSASHA1-NSEC3-SHA1 for DNSSEC Delegation and DNSSEC signing since these algorithms are no longer considered to be secure.

Operational Considerations Zone owners currently making use of SHA-1 based algorithms should immediately roll to algorithms with stronger cryptographic algorithms, such as the recommended algorithms in the and tables. Operators should take care when deploying software packages and operating systems that may have already removed support for the SHA-1 algorithm. In these situations software may need to be manually built and deployed by an operator to continue supporting the required levels indicated by the "Use for DNSSEC Validation" and "Implement for DNSSEC Validation" columns, which this document is not changing.

IANA Considerations [Note to IANA, to be removed by the RFC Editor: the registry fields listed above will be created by draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8624-bis.] IANA is requested to set the "Use for DNSSEC Delegation" field of the "Digest Algorithms" registry for SHA-1 (1) to MUST NOT. IANA is requested to set the "Use for DNSSEC Signing" column of the DNS Security Algorithm Numbers registry to MUST NOT for the RSASHA1 (5) and RSASHA1-NSEC3-SHA1 (7) algorithms. All other columns should remain as currently specified.

Normative References n.d. n.d.

Acknowledgments The authors appreciate the comments and suggestions from the following IETF participants in helping produce this document: Mark Andrews, Steve Crocker, Peter Dickson, Thomas Graf, Paul Hoffman, Russ Housley, Shumon Huque, Barry Leiba, S Moonesamy, Yoav Nir, Florian Obser, Peter Thomassen, Stefan Ubbink, Paul Wouters, Tim Wicinski, and the many members of the DNSOP working group that discussed this draft.

Current algorithm usage levels The DNSSEC scanning project by Viktor Dukhovni and Wes Hardaker highlights the current deployment of various algorithms on the https://stats.dnssec-tools.org/ website. <RFC Editor: please delete this section upon publication>

Github Version of this document While this document is under development, it can be viewed, tracked, fill here: https://github.com/hardaker/draft-hardaker-dnsop-must-not-sha1 <RFC Editor: please delete this section upon publication>