ECRIT Working Group
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                       C. Holmberg
Internet-Draft
Request for Comments: 7163                                   I. Sedlacek
Updates: 5031 (if approved)                                                   Ericsson
Intended status:
Category: Standards Track                         January 8, 2014
Expires: July 12,                                     March 2014
ISSN: 2070-1721

              URN For Country Specific Emergency Services
                draft-ietf-ecrit-country-emg-urn-03.txt

Abstract

   Section 4.2 of RFC 5031 allows the registration of service URNs with
   the 'sos' service type only for emergency services "that are offered
   widely and in different countries".  This document updates those
   instructions in RFC 5031 to allow such registrations when, at the time of
   registration, those services are offered in only one country only. country.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents an Internet Standards Track document.

   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
   (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list  It represents the consensus of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid the IETF community.  It has
   received public review and has been approved for a maximum publication by the
   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on
   Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.

   Information about the current status of six months this document, any errata,
   and how to provide feedback on it may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents obtained at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on July 12, 2014.
   http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7163.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   3.  Update to RFC 5031  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     3.1.  General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     3.2.  New text replacing Text Replacing the text Text of the 2nd paragraph Paragraph of
           section
           Section 4.2 of RFC 5031 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   4.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   5.  Change Log  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   6.  References  . . . . . .   4
   6.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   7.
     6.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . .   4
     6.2.  Informative Reference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5   4

1.  Introduction

   Table 1 shows the policy

   The advice to experts for registration of registering sub-services of the service URN
   with the 'sos' service type, as defined type is provided in section 4.2. Section 4.2 of RFC 5031 [RFC5031].

   +-------------------------------------------------------------------+
   |
   [RFC5031] as follows:

      The 'sos' service type describes emergency services requiring an  |
   |
      immediate response, typically offered by various branches of the  |
   |
      government or other public institutions.  Additional sub-services |
   |
      can be added after expert review and must be of general public    |
   |
      interest and have a similar emergency nature.  The expert is      |
   |
      designated by the ECRIT working group, its successor, or, in      |
   | their
      absence, the IESG.  The expert review should only approve   |
   |
      emergency services that are offered widely and in different       |
   |
      countries, with approximately the same caller expectation in      |
   | terms
      of services rendered.  The 'sos' service is not meant to    |
   | invoke
      general government, public information, counseling, or     |
   | social
      services.                                                  |
   +-------------------------------------------------------------------+

                Table 1: Excerpt from RFC 5031 section 4.2.

   Some existing emergency services are, at least initially, offered in
   only one country only. country.  Examples are the "Reporting spies" emergency
   service offered in South Korea and the "GAULA (anti-kidnapping)"
   emergency service offered in Colombia according to http://
   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_telephone_number (as per January 8th
   2014). [WIKIPEDIA].
   Future emergency service might also initially be introduced in only
   one country only. country.

   The policy for registration advice to experts of sub-services of the service URN with the
   'sos' service type, as defined type provided in RFC 5031 [RFC5031], [RFC5031] prevents the
   registration of a sub-service of the service URN with the 'sos'
   service type for a service that, at the time of registration, is
   offered in one country only.

   This document updates the 2nd paragraph of section Section 4.2 of RFC 5031
   [RFC5031], in order to allow the registration of service URNs with
   the 'sos' service type for emergency services that, at the time of
   registration, are offered in one country only.

2.  Conventions

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14, RFC 2119
   [RFC2119].

3.  Update to RFC 5031

3.1.  General

   Section 3.2 of this document replaces the text of the 2nd paragraph
   of section Section 4.2 (Sub-Services for the 'sos' Service) of RFC 5031
   [RFC5031].

3.2.  New text replacing Text Replacing the text Text of the 2nd paragraph Paragraph of section Section 4.2 of
      RFC 5031

   The 'sos' service type describes emergency services requiring an
   immediate response, typically offered by various branches of the
   government or other public institutions.  Additional sub-services can
   be added after expert review.  The expert is designated by the ECRIT
   working group, its successor, or, in their absence, the IESG.  The
   designated expert should only approve services that have are to be used
   for emergency
   nature, purposes, that are offered in at least one country,
   that do not match the description of any existing service URN with
   the 'sos' service type, and where the service description and the URN
   are defined as broadly as possible to encourage reuse.  The 'sos'
   service is not meant to invoke general government, public
   information, counseling, or social services.

4.  IANA Considerations

   This document updates the advice to the expert for the registry of
   sub-services of the "sos" service. "'sos' Sub-
   Services" registry.  IANA is requested to update has updated the reference for that registry from RFC 5031 [RFC5031]
   to this document.

   http://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-serviceid-labels

5.  Change Log

   [RFC EDITOR NOTE: Please remove this section when publishing]

   Changes from draft-ietf-ecrit-country-emg-urn-02

   o  Changes based on IESG review.

   o  - Old section 3, 4 and 5.2 removed.

   o  - Only modified paragraph kept in section 5.3.

   o  - Date added point to Wikipedia reference.

   Changes from draft-ietf-ecrit-country-emg-urn-01

   o  Security Considerations section updated.

   Changes from draft-ietf-ecrit-country-emg-urn-00

   o  IANA Considerations section updated.  Open issue removed.

   Changes from draft-holmberg-ecrit-country-emg-urn-02

   o  Minor editorial fixes.

   Changes from draft-holmberg-ecrit-country-emg-urn-01

   o  Technical fix: Instead this document (instead of creating a new sub-tree, the 'sos'
      registration rules in RFC are updated, to allow registration of
      URNs that, at the time of registration, are specific to a single
      country.

   Changes from draft-holmberg-ecrit-country-emg-urn-00

   o  Editorial fix: cannot be not fulfilled -> cannot be fulfilled

6. 5031 [RFC5031]).

   http://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-serviceid-labels

5.  Security Considerations

   This document does not update the Security Considerations of RFC
   5031.

7.

6.  References

6.1.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

   [RFC5031]  Schulzrinne, H., "A Uniform Resource Name (URN) for
              Emergency and Other Well-Known Services", RFC 5031,
              January 2008.

6.2.  Informative Reference

   [WIKIPEDIA]
              Wikipedia, "Emergency telephone number", March 2014,
              <http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Emergency_telep
              hone_number&oldid=599435311>.

Authors' Addresses

   Christer Holmberg
   Ericsson
   Hirsalantie 11
   Jorvas  02420
   Finland

   Email:

   EMail: christer.holmberg@ericsson.com

   Ivo Sedlacek
   Ericsson
   Sokolovska 79
   Praha  18600
   Czech Republic

   Email:

   EMail: ivo.sedlacek@ericsson.com