Given a DNA alignment, one wonders which phylogenetic inference model
fits that alignment best. mcbette
(‘Model Comparison using
babette’) can give the answer.
In this example, we use a ‘BEAST2’ example alignment and compare the fit of two inference models on that alignment. We’ll interpret the finding in the end, concluding which inference model to use.
First, load mcbette
:
To use mcbette
, BEAST2 and the BEAST2 NS
package must be installed:
if (rappdirs::app_dir()$os == "win") {
message("'mcbette' can only run on Linux and MacOS")
} else if (!beastier::is_beast2_installed()) {
message(
"BEAST2 must be installed. ",
"Tip: use 'beastier::install_beast2()'"
)
} else if (!mauricer::is_beast2_ns_pkg_installed()) {
message(
"The BEAST2 'NS' package must be installed. ",
"Tip: use 'mauricer::install_beast2_pkg(\"NS\")'"
)
}
#> BEAST2 must be installed. Tip: use 'beastier::install_beast2()'
If you’ve just gotten a message that you need to install either BEAST2 or the BEAST2 NS package, do so. The rest of this vignette will be empty.
To run mcbette
, we need a FASTA file with a DNA
alignment in it. We use one that is present in the mcbette
package:
Now we have the alignment saved in our FASTA file, we can display it:
mcbette
allows one to select the evolutionary model that
has the heighest evidence (aka marginal likelihood) for having generated
that alignment. For more information how to set up an inference model,
see the ‘Inference models’ vignette of the beautier
package:
vignette("beautier", "inference_models")
In this example, we compare two evolutionary models on the alignment shown above. Because the best evolutionary model will likely be used in Bayesian inference, in this example we will use ‘evolutionary model’ and ‘inference model’ interchangably.
One of the inference models is the default babette
inference model.
inference_model_1 <- beautier::create_ns_inference_model()
inference_model_1$site_model$name
#> [1] "JC69"
only differing in their nucleotide substitution model:
if (can_run_mcbette()) {
# Create the two inference models
inference_model_1 <- beautier::create_ns_inference_model(
site_model = beautier::create_jc69_site_model()
)
inference_model_2 <- beautier::create_ns_inference_model(
site_model = beautier::create_gtr_site_model()
)
# Shorten the run, by doing a short (dirty, unreliable) MCMC
inference_model_1$mcmc <- beautier::create_test_ns_mcmc()
inference_model_2$mcmc <- beautier::create_test_ns_mcmc()
# Combine the two inference models
inference_models <- c(list(inference_model_1), list(inference_model_2))
# Compare the the two inference models
marg_liks <- est_marg_liks(
fasta_filename = fasta_filename,
inference_models = inference_models
)
knitr::kable(marg_liks)
}
The results are interpreted by
interpret_marg_lik_estimates
as follows:
Clean up: