The margins and prediction packages
are a combined effort to port the functionality of Stata’s (closed
source) margins
command to (open source) R. These tools provide ways of obtaining common
quantities of interest from regression-type models.
margins provides “marginal effects” summaries of models
and prediction provides unit-specific and sample
average predictions from models. Marginal effects are partial
derivatives of the regression equation with respect to each variable in
the model for each unit in the data; average marginal effects are simply
the mean of these unit-specific partial derivatives over some sample. In
ordinary least squares regression with no interactions or higher-order
term, the estimated slope coefficients are marginal effects. In other
cases and for generalized linear models, the coefficients are not
marginal effects at least not on the scale of the response variable.
margins therefore provides ways of calculating the
marginal effects of variables to make these models more
interpretable.
The major functionality of Stata’s margins
command -
namely the estimation of marginal (or partial) effects - is provided
here through a single function, margins()
. This is an S3
generic method for calculating the marginal effects of covariates
included in model objects (like those of classes “lm” and “glm”). Users
interested in generating predicted (fitted) values, such as the
“predictive margins” generated by Stata’s margins
command,
should consider using prediction()
from the sibling
project, prediction.
Stata’s margins
command is very simple and intuitive to
use:
. import delimited mtcars.csv
. quietly reg mpg c.cyl##c.hp wt
. margins, dydx(*)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Delta-method
| dy/dx Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
cyl | .0381376 .5998897 0.06 0.950 -1.192735 1.26901
hp | -.0463187 .014516 -3.19 0.004 -.076103 -.0165343
wt | -3.119815 .661322 -4.72 0.000 -4.476736 -1.762894
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. marginsplot
With margins in R, replicating Stata’s results is
incredibly simple using just the margins()
method to obtain
average marginal effects and its summary()
method to obtain
Stata-like output:
library("margins")
x <- lm(mpg ~ cyl * hp + wt, data = mtcars)
(m <- margins(x))
## Average marginal effects
## lm(formula = mpg ~ cyl * hp + wt, data = mtcars)
## cyl hp wt
## 0.03814 -0.04632 -3.12
summary(m)
## factor AME SE z p lower upper
## cyl 0.0381 0.5999 0.0636 0.9493 -1.1376 1.2139
## hp -0.0463 0.0145 -3.1909 0.0014 -0.0748 -0.0179
## wt -3.1198 0.6613 -4.7175 0.0000 -4.4160 -1.8236
With the exception of differences in rounding, the above results
match identically what Stata’s margins
command produces. A
slightly more concise expression relies on the syntactic sugar provided
by margins_summary()
:
margins_summary(x)
## factor AME SE z p lower upper
## cyl 0.0381 0.5999 0.0636 0.9493 -1.1376 1.2139
## hp -0.0463 0.0145 -3.1909 0.0014 -0.0748 -0.0179
## wt -3.1198 0.6613 -4.7175 0.0000 -4.4160 -1.8236
Using the plot()
method also yields an aesthetically
similar result to Stata’s marginsplot
:
plot(m)
margins()
margins is intended as a port of (some of) the
features of Stata’s margins
command, which includes
numerous options for calculating marginal effects at the mean values of
a dataset (i.e., the marginal effects at the mean), an average of the
marginal effects at each value of a dataset (i.e., the average marginal
effect), marginal effects at representative values, and any of those
operations on various subsets of a dataset. (The functionality of
Stata’s command to produce predictive margins is not ported, as
this is easily obtained from the prediction
package.) In particular, Stata provides the following options:
at
: calculate marginal effects at (potentially
representative) specified values (i.e., replacing observed values with
specified replacement values before calculating marginal effects)atmeans
: calculate marginal effects at the mean (MEMs)
of a dataset rather than the default behavior of calculating average
marginal effects (AMEs)over
: calculate marginal effects (including MEMs and/or
AMEs at observed or specified values) on subsets of the original data
(e.g., the marginal effect of a treatment separately for men and
women)The at
argument has been translated into
margins()
in a very similar manner. It can be used by
specifying a list of variable names and specified values for those
variables at which to calculate marginal effects, such as
margins(x, at = list(hp=150))
. When using at
,
margins()
constructs modified datasets - using
build_datalist()
- containing the specified values and
calculates marginal effects on each modified dataset,
rbind
-ing them back into a single “margins” object.
Stata’s atmeans
argument is not implemented in
margins()
for various reasons, including because it is
possible to achieve the effect manually through an operation like
data$var <- mean(data$var, na.rm = TRUE)
and passing the
modified data frame to margins(x, data = data)
.
At present, margins()
does not implement the
over
option. The reason for this is also simple: R already
makes data subsetting operations quite simple using simple
[
extraction. If, for example, one wanted to calculate
marginal effects on subsets of a data frame, those subsets can be passed
directly to margins()
via the data
argument
(as in a call to prediction()
).
The rest of this vignette shows how to use at
and
data
to obtain various kinds of marginal effects, and how
to use plotting functions to visualize those inferences.
We can start by loading the margins package:
library("margins")
We’ll use a simple example regression model based on the built-in
mtcars
dataset:
x <- lm(mpg ~ cyl + hp * wt, data = mtcars)
To obtain average marginal effects (AMEs), we simply call
margins()
on the model object created by
lm()
:
margins(x)
## Average marginal effects
## lm(formula = mpg ~ cyl + hp * wt, data = mtcars)
## cyl hp wt
## -0.3652 -0.02527 -3.838
The result is a data frame with special class "margins"
.
"margins"
objects are printed in a tidy summary format, by
default, as you can see above. The only difference between a
"margins"
object and a regular data frame are some
additional data frame-level attributes that dictate how the object is
printed.
The default method calculates marginal effects for all variables
included in the model (ala Stata’s , dydx(*)
option). To
limit calculation to only a subset of variables, use the
variables
argument:
summary(margins(x, variables = "hp"))
## factor AME SE z p lower upper
## hp -0.0253 0.0105 -2.4046 0.0162 -0.0459 -0.0047
In an ordinary least squares regression, there is really only one way
of examining marginal effects (that is, on the scale of the outcome
variable). In a generalized linear model (e.g., logit), however, it is
possible to examine true “marginal effects” (i.e., the marginal
contribution of each variable on the scale of the linear predictor) or
“partial effects” (i.e., the contribution of each variable on the
outcome scale, conditional on the other variables involved in the link
function transformation of the linear predictor). The latter are the
default in margins()
, which implicitly sets the argument
margins(x, type = "response")
and passes that through to
prediction()
methods. To obtain the former, simply set
margins(x, type = "link")
. There’s some debate about which
of these is preferred and even what to call the two different quantities
of interest. Regardless of all of that, here’s how you obtain
either:
x <- glm(am ~ cyl + hp * wt, data = mtcars, family = binomial)
## Warning: glm.fit: fitted probabilities numerically 0 or 1 occurred
margins(x, type = "response") # the default
## Average marginal effects
## glm(formula = am ~ cyl + hp * wt, family = binomial, data = mtcars)
## cyl hp wt
## 0.02156 0.002667 -0.5158
margins(x, type = "link")
## Average marginal effects
## glm(formula = am ~ cyl + hp * wt, family = binomial, data = mtcars)
## cyl hp wt
## 0.5156 0.05151 -12.24
Note that some other packages available for R, as well as Stata’s
margins
and mfx
packages enable calculation of
so-called “marginal effects at means” (i.e., the marginal effect for a
single observation that has covariate values equal to the means of the
sample as a whole). The substantive interpretation of these is fairly
ambiguous. While it was once common practice to estimate MEMs - rather
than AMEs or MERs - this is now considered somewhat inappropriate
because it focuses on cases that may not exist (e.g., the average of a
0/1 variable is not going to reflect a case that can actually exist in
reality) and we are often interested in the effect of a variable at
multiple possible values of covariates, rather than an arbitrarily
selected case that is deemed “typical” in this way. As such,
margins()
defaults to reporting AMEs, unless modified by
the at
argument to calculate average “marginal effects for
representative cases” (MERs). MEMs could be obtained by manually
specifying at
for every variable in a way that respects the
variables classes and inherent meaning of the data, but that
functionality is not demonstrated here.
at
ArgumentThe at
argument allows you to calculate marginal effects
at representative cases (sometimes “MERs”) or marginal effects at means
- or any other statistic - (sometimes “MEMs”), which are marginal
effects for particularly interesting (sets of) observations in a
dataset. This differs from marginal effects on subsets of the original
data (see the next section for a demonstration of that) in that it
operates on a modified set of the full dataset wherein particular
variables have been replaced by specified values. This is helpful
because it allows for calculation of marginal effects for
counterfactual datasets (e.g., what if all women were instead
men? what if all democracies were instead autocracies? what if all
foreign cars were instead domestic?).
As an example, if we wanted to know if the marginal effect of
horsepower (hp
) on fuel economy differed across different
types of automobile transmissions, we could simply use at
to obtain separate marginal effect estimates for our data as if every
car observation were a manual versus if every car observation were an
automatic. The output of margins()
is a simplified summary
of the estimated marginal effects across the requested variable
levels/combinations specified in at
:
x <- lm(mpg ~ cyl + wt + hp * am, data = mtcars)
margins(x, at = list(am = 0:1))
## Average marginal effects at specified values
## lm(formula = mpg ~ cyl + wt + hp * am, data = mtcars)
## at(am) cyl wt hp am
## 0 -0.9339 -2.812 -0.008945 1.034
## 1 -0.9339 -2.812 -0.026392 1.034
Because of the hp * am
interaction in the regression,
the marginal effect of horsepower differs between the two sets of
results. We can also specify more than one variable to at
,
creating a potentially long list of marginal effects results. For
example, we can produce marginal effects at both levels of
am
and the values from the five-number summary (minimum,
Q1, median, Q3, and maximum) of observed values of hp
. This
produces 2 * 5 = 10 sets of marginal effects estimates:
margins(x, at = list(am = 0:1, hp = fivenum(mtcars$hp)))
## Average marginal effects at specified values
## lm(formula = mpg ~ cyl + wt + hp * am, data = mtcars)
## at(am) at(hp) cyl wt hp am
## 0 52 -0.9339 -2.812 -0.008945 2.6864
## 1 52 -0.9339 -2.812 -0.026392 2.6864
## 0 96 -0.9339 -2.812 -0.008945 1.9188
## 1 96 -0.9339 -2.812 -0.026392 1.9188
## 0 123 -0.9339 -2.812 -0.008945 1.4477
## 1 123 -0.9339 -2.812 -0.026392 1.4477
## 0 180 -0.9339 -2.812 -0.008945 0.4533
## 1 180 -0.9339 -2.812 -0.026392 0.4533
## 0 335 -0.9339 -2.812 -0.008945 -2.2509
## 1 335 -0.9339 -2.812 -0.026392 -2.2509
Because this is a linear model, the marginal effects of
cyl
and wt
do not vary across levels of
am
or hp
. The minimum and Q1 value of
hp
are also the same, so the marginal effects of
am
are the same in the first two results. As you can see,
however, the marginal effect of hp
differs when
am == 0
versus am == 1
(first and second rows)
and the marginal effect of am
differs across levels of
hp
(e.g., between the first and third rows). As should be
clear, the at
argument is incredibly useful for getting a
better grasp of the marginal effects of different covariates.
This becomes especially apparent when a model includes power-terms (or any other alternative functional form of a covariate). Consider, for example, the simple model of fuel economy as a function of weight, with weight included as both a first- and second-order term:
x <- lm(mpg ~ wt + I(wt^2), data = mtcars)
summary(x)
##
## Call:
## lm(formula = mpg ~ wt + I(wt^2), data = mtcars)
##
## Residuals:
## Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
## -3.483 -1.998 -0.773 1.462 6.238
##
## Coefficients:
## Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
## (Intercept) 49.9308 4.2113 11.856 1.21e-12 ***
## wt -13.3803 2.5140 -5.322 1.04e-05 ***
## I(wt^2) 1.1711 0.3594 3.258 0.00286 **
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
##
## Residual standard error: 2.651 on 29 degrees of freedom
## Multiple R-squared: 0.8191, Adjusted R-squared: 0.8066
## F-statistic: 65.64 on 2 and 29 DF, p-value: 1.715e-11
Looking only at the regression results table, it is actually quite
difficult to understand the effect of wt
on fuel economy
because it requires performing mental multiplication and addition on all
possible values of wt
. Using the at
option to
margins, you could quickly obtain a sense of the average marginal effect
of wt
at a range of plausible values:
margins(x, at = list(wt = fivenum(mtcars$wt)))
## Average marginal effects at specified values
## lm(formula = mpg ~ wt + I(wt^2), data = mtcars)
## at(wt) wt
## 1.513 -9.8366
## 2.542 -7.4254
## 3.325 -5.5926
## 3.650 -4.8314
## 5.424 -0.6764
The marginal effects in the first column of results reveal that the
average marginal effect of wt
is large and negative except
when wt
is very large, in which case it has an effect not
distinguishable from zero. We can easily plot these results using the
cplot()
function to see the effect visually in terms of
either predicted fuel economy or the marginal effect of
wt
:
cplot(x, "wt", what = "prediction", main = "Predicted Fuel Economy, Given Weight")
cplot(x, "wt", what = "effect", main = "Average Marginal Effect of Weight")
A really nice feature of Stata’s margins command is that it handles
factor variables gracefully. This functionality is difficult to emulate
in R, but the margins()
function does its best. Here we see
the marginal effects of a simple regression that includes a factor
variable:
x <- lm(mpg ~ factor(cyl) * hp + wt, data = mtcars)
margins(x)
## Average marginal effects
## lm(formula = mpg ~ factor(cyl) * hp + wt, data = mtcars)
## hp wt cyl6 cyl8
## -0.04475 -3.06 1.473 0.8909
margins()
recognizes the factor and displays the
marginal effect for each level of the factor separately. (Caveat: this
may not work with certain at
specifications, yet.)
Stata’s margins
command includes an over()
option, which allows you to very easily calculate marginal effects on
subsets of the data (e.g., separately for men and women). This is useful
in Stata because the program only allows one dataset in memory. Because
R does not impose this restriction and further makes subsetting
expressions very simple, that feature is not really useful and can be
achieved using standard subsetting notation in R:
x <- lm(mpg ~ factor(cyl) * am + hp + wt, data = mtcars)
# automatic vehicles
margins(x, data = mtcars[mtcars$am == 0, ])
## Average marginal effects
## lm(formula = mpg ~ factor(cyl) * am + hp + wt, data = mtcars)
## am hp wt cyl6 cyl8
## 1.706 -0.03115 -2.441 -1.715 -1.586
# manual vehicles
margins(x, data = mtcars[mtcars$am == 1, ])
## Average marginal effects
## lm(formula = mpg ~ factor(cyl) * am + hp + wt, data = mtcars)
## am hp wt cyl6 cyl8
## 2.167 -0.03115 -2.441 -4.218 -2.656
Because a "margins"
object is just a data frame, it is
also possible to obtain the same result by subsetting the
output of margins()
:
m <- margins(x)
split(m, m$am)
## $`0`
## Average marginal effects
## lm(formula = mpg ~ factor(cyl) * am + hp + wt, data = mtcars)
## am hp wt cyl6 cyl8
## 1.706 -0.03115 -2.441 -1.715 -1.586
##
## $`1`
## Average marginal effects
## lm(formula = mpg ~ factor(cyl) * am + hp + wt, data = mtcars)
## am hp wt cyl6 cyl8
## 2.167 -0.03115 -2.441 -4.218 -2.656
Using margins()
to calculate marginal effects enables
several kinds of plotting. The built-in plot()
method for
objects of class "margins"
creates simple diagnostic plots
for examining the output of margins()
in visual rather than
tabular format. It is also possible to use the output of
margins()
to produce more typical marginal effects plots
that show the marginal effect of one variable across levels of another
variable. This section walks through the plot()
method and
then shows how to produce marginal effects plots using base
graphics.
plot()
method for “margins” objectsThe margins package implements a plot()
method for objects of class "margins"
(seen above). This
produces a plot similar (in spirit) to the output of Stata’s
marginsplot
. It is highly customizable, but is meant
primarily as a diagnostic tool to examine the results of
margins()
. It simply produces, by default, a plot of
marginal effects along with 95% confidence intervals for those effects.
The confidence level can be modified using the levels
argument, which is vectorized to allow multiple levels to be specified
simultaneously.
There are two common ways of visually representing the substantive results of a regression model: (1) fitted values plots, which display the fitted conditional mean outcome across levels of a covariate, and (2) marginal effects plots, which display the estimated marginal effect of a variable across levels of a covariate. This section discusses both approaches.
Fitted value plots can be created using cplot()
(to
provide conditional predicted value plots or
conditional effect plots) and both the persp()
method and image()
method for "lm"
objects,
which display the same type of relationships in three-dimensions (i.e.,
across two conditioning covariates).
For example, we can use cplot()
to quickly display the
predicted fuel economy of a vehicle from a model:
x <- lm(mpg ~ cyl + wt * am, data = mtcars)
cplot(x, "cyl")